_ Web.log
r RSS

tag: modelling


Emergence ch12: Sorting and Mixing: Race and Sex

in project: emergence-advent

Thomas Schelling - Sorting and Mixing: Race and Sex (1978)

Read as PDF

Moving into the socioeconomic applications of emergence theory, Schelling (Nobel laureate #2 in this collection) gives a model-based analysis of feedback loops within free market social systems, taken from his text Micromotives and Macrobehaviour. The result is a somewhat more insidious emergent result than the constructive formations we've seen in previous accounts: Schelling's models suggests that minor dispositions against living in a racial minority can result in a neighbourhood's total racial segregation.

Appearing at almost precisely the same time as the rise in popularity of game theory, it incorporates many of the same ideas and approaches. It seems that Micromotives is to economics what The Evolution of Cooperation and The Selfish Gene are to evolutionary theory. Schelling's work is similarly appealing in scope and presentation, and significantly less dogmatic than the hardline reductionism of Dawkins.

Emergence ch11: Emergence

in project: emergence-advent

Andrew Assad and Norman Packard - Emergence (1992)

This chapter marks a watershed as the first from the perspective of computational modelling and artificial life. It's very brief, with its prime contributions being an outline of a couple of key characteristics of (epistemic-computational) emergence plus a useful bibliography from the field: Bergson, Langton, Kauffman, Pattee, Cariani (who, I would argue, is by far the most glaring omission as an author in this book).

Assad and Packard offer a yardstick scale of emergence, based on mechanical deducibility of behaviours:

Non-emergent: Behavior is immediately deducible upon inspection of the specification or rules generating it
Weakly emergent: Behavior is deducible in hindsight from the specification after observing the behavior
...
Strongly emergent: Behavior is deducible in theory, but its elucidation is prohibitively difficult
Maximally emergent: Behavior is impossible to deduce from the specification.

It strikes me that, if we are to maintain an axiom of fundamental reducibility, the "maximally emergent" pole must be approached asymptotically (ie, cannot be attained) as "impossible to deduce" implies that the base-level laws are insufficient to explain the properties - so we have smuggled in (in Bedau's terminology) strong emergence.

More interestingly, they suggest a hierarchy of subsets of the types of thing that emerge from a substrate: structure (in space-time or symbolic space); from which arises computation (information-processing capabilities); from which then arises functionality (towards beneficial objectives). This seems like an elegant and useful formulation which can clearly be see when looking back at the emergence of complexity described in the previous chapter.